Bernard Zick's

Advice for the Impatient Investor

For real estate investors who don't have time or money to waste!  

May 2005

Editors: Bernard "Barney" Zick bernard@zick.com, Karen Zick and Amy McIntee

This email was sent to you by REIT, Corp. To ensure delivery to your inbox (not bulk or junk folders), please add bernard2-9168385@autocontactor.com to your address book.

In this issue:

Getting Started

Advanced Strategies

GETTING THE MOST OUT OF A DEAL

the easy way to look bad

IRA assets are protected from creditors

Upcoming Events

 

Getting Started 

Q.  I have this deal and I would like you to tell me if I should do it or not. If I should, how do I do it to maximize my profit. Here are the details:
Purchase: $154,400
Down pmt: 7720 5%
L/A: $146,680
PM: $977.12
Tax+ insurance: $193
Monthly PM: $1120.12
Tenant willing to pay: $1295
Approx value of the house in 1 year: $169,900

This house is in South GA and I'm going to do this with my self-direct Roth IRA. 

Please let me know what you think ASAP if you can.

Thanks,
Christine

A.  It
looks like a good deal because you already have a lease option tenant that gives you a positive cash flow.

You realize that if you have the title to the home in your IRA you will have UBIT or a penalty tax to pay.  Basically, to the extent you used borrowed money to make a profit you will pay tax on that portion of the profit.

There are several ways to keep that from being so bad.  I am assuming you are buying the house “subject to,” but you might consider buying it with a lease option. Have your IRA pay for the options then have a different entity sign the lease.

If you can only do it "subject to," and you have a with whom you partner, they can own the property and you put up the money as a shared appreciation mortgage.

If you are putting on a new loan on the house, I don’t have any suggestions. If you do, I’d like to hear them.

Now remember, I am not a tax attorney or CPA.

But, all in all, it sounds like a good deal and you should do the deal in a flash!  

BZ

Advanced Strategies

Q.  Mr. Zick, I know you are not an attorney nor would anything you provide me qualify as legal advice. I was listening to my “Hidden Profits” CDs a few days ago and I learned about the clauses mentioned.  They were “Substitution of Collateral” and “Right of Subordination”. My sellers have agreed to accept both on the seller financed note we are creating as part of a deal.

Do you have any boilerplate paragraphs for those clauses that I can insert in the security deed?

Thanks a bunch!  Brian

A. 
You really need to get a properly written clause, which means paying a lawyer.

The general idea is:

Borrower retains the right to subordinate this note to a note that is paid in full in no longer than __x___ months from ___(date)______ and has a total loan amount of no more  than _______ initially.

And,

Borrower retains the right to substitute x property (name the specific property)…. (or) a property that fits this description ___(spell it out)…. (or) any single family house in ___x___ county with at least ___x___ dollars in equity and ----

Hope this gives you the basic ideas. None of these examples are intended to be the words you use.

Also, I need to tell you that some states have special laws that cover these clauses. California is one of them. They give you rules regarding the placement of the clauses in the document and the size of the type, etc. This is just one more reason to get a local lawyer to draw it up. I would.

BZ

GETTING THE MOST OUT OF A DEAL

Q.  I've got a prospective mortgage client who's looking to buy his first house, but has an interesting situation. My prospective client, Frank, is the foreman of a contractor working for me to rehab one of my houses.

Frank is currently renting a house, and his landlord has offered to sell it to him for $150K below market value, primarily because it needs a lot of fix-up. You can probably see this coming -- he'd like to get institutional purchase financing based upon market value, not sale price, so he can afford to fix it up. I told him that normally you have to wait a year to refinance to take advantage of the real market value. But I said I'd see if I could help him out on his request.

The purchase price is $250K, market value is $400K. The seller is apparently willing to cooperate in any way to help the client buy it in the manner he wishes.

I have an idea on how he can do it, but I'd like your comments on its efficacy, or perhaps another suggestion that would work better.

Here's the idea: Use a title holding trust intermediary. Frank can set up the trust with his boss, Fred, as trustee, and Frank as beneficiary. The trust signs a contract (executed by the trustee, Fred) to buy the house from the seller for $250K. Frank then signs a contract to buy the house from the trust for $400K (the home's appraised value), with 20% down. A simultaneous closing is then executed. Because the bank sees a purchase price of $400K, they give him an 80% LTV loan at $320K. Frank's "cash" down payment to the trust is only on paper. Because Frank is the beneficiary of the trust, he receives back the $80K down payment, plus the $70K excess loan proceeds. Frank now has $70K to work with to fix up the place.

My major concern is finding a title company that will not balk at these shenanigans. Of course we also need to work with a lender that doesn't require verification of funds for the down payment (easy enough to find).

Do you have any other suggestions that might work better?

Thanks for your help!

A.  Since the trust will not have been in existence over a year, you have the same seasoning problem with your solution as you have with no solution. Secondly, since most lenders want the borrower to take the property out of the trust and get the loan in their own name, you may not be able to use the trust (Now I hear that All Fund Mortgage is developing a product that will not make you take the property out of the trust, but that may not be possible for a couple of months.)  Let’s talk down payment. Lenders want 5% minimum. So many more programs open up with 5% minimum. It would be good to figure a solution to that. Lastly, if the only reason for the trust was to pump up price, that is fraud.

Let’s look at another concept just to get the idea on the table...

Frank buys for $400,000, paying the seller a $150,000 note due in five years and a new first for $250,000. He can get that first from a “C” or less credit lender with no pre payment penalties and a fair amount of points. Maybe from Argent. The second note is held in escrow with the seller signing a list of things that need to be done for which, if all completed, the seller will give a $150,000 credit. Think retail repair costs.

There might be 100 changes and modifications to this but this is the core plan. It will be hard to find the first lender but not all that hard. It will be very hard to find anyone to refinance for $400,000 but he does not need the full $150,000.

I have checked this out with others in the industry and if done for good reasons, it will fly. Still check it out for yourself.

This is like playing pool. Most of the problem will be picking the first shot that will leave you set up correctly for the second shot.

If I was doing it, I would go with a hard money loan for the first and close the second out of that escrow and concentrate on who our lender will be and what will they want.

BZ

++++++++++++++

My loan officer replied…..

Hi Barney,

Hmmm.... How about this:

Sale price $400K, buyer gets a purchase loan for $200K and a seller carry-back note for $200K. The note terms would be 30 years, 1% interest, payments $643.28.

Now, if the seller were to sell that note on the open market a year later to a note buyer who wanted to yield 15.25%, then the remaining 348 payments would fetch a note price of $49,993.87.

So the buyer executes an option (for $1) with the seller to purchase back the $200K note 12 months later, discounted to $49,993.87, to yield 15.25%. The buyer then exercises that option in a year (now being obligated to pay himself $643.28 for the next 29 years ;-). This has the advantage of being an ironclad contractual guarantee that the seller or his heirs won't have a change of heart in a year. The option can be a separate but simultaneous transaction, never seen in the original escrow.

Of course, that assumes that the seller doesn't owe more than $200K on any existing liens. If the seller owes the full $250K that he's willing to sell for, then this won't work. Of course, the numbers could be adjusted a bit: a yield of 21% on $150K for 348 months would be a note price of $27,515.64. Thus, the buyer's extended purchase price would be $277,515.64. Not that great of a difference. Obviously, this concept can be adjusted to work with whatever the actual current lien total is on the property.

How's that sound?

++++++++++++++

Keep working on it. I like the direction. Shows you are thinking. Let me know how this works out.

BZ



The easy way to look bad

It is easy to make mistakes and to do things wrong.  I've been under a heavy schedule of medical procedures, reducing me to a few hours of work time each day.  (And, by the way, the last set of tests show major improvement, so keep up the prayers – they are working!)

This newsletter is being published a few days late this month and it happened with no help from us!  It seems our Internet Service Provider did hardware upgrades the end of last week just as I was finishing the newsletter. We have two email accounts and the main one (bernard@zick.com) generates over 100 emails a day.  I use the second account to communicate with my staff and I did not realize it was not working properly.  This impacted the completion of this issue of our newsletter by our deadline of May 1st.  We're sorry about the late delivery. I figure one day late is okay but this extended delay is not.  We apologize.

BZ



IRA assets are protected from creditors

4/11/05

 

Supreme Court Rules That Creditors May Not Seize IRA Assets in Bankruptcy Proceedings

 

In a huge victory for managed and self-directed IRA owners everywhere, the U.S. Supreme Court recently ruled that IRAs receive Federal Creditor Protection. This means that creditors cannot seize assets in an Individual Retirement Account.

 

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously that IRAs should join pensions, 401(k)s, Social Security and other benefits tied to age, illness or disability, that are afforded protection under federal bankruptcy law and thus shielded from creditors in bankruptcy proceedings.

 

Until recently, IRA protection was covered by state laws, which varied to a great extent on coverage provided. This ambiguity led to a great deal of confusion and uncertainty for IRA owners wondering how their assets were protected from creditors.

 

The case before the Supreme Court was heard because of a lower court ruling against IRA protection based on the faulty notion that since investors can make IRA withdrawals at any time, IRAs are similar to savings accounts, which are unprotected from creditors under bankruptcy law.

 

Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Court, said a bankrupt Arkansas couple was entitled to keep more than $55,000 in retirement savings from creditors. He reasoned that IRAs are benefits tied to a person's age under the federal statute because a tax penalty is imposed if a person makes withdrawals before age 60.

 

Interestingly enough, the court did not choose to address the topic of whether very large IRA accounts would be protected under the federal bankruptcy code. The code has a provision stating that certain assets (such as retirement plans) that are deemed to be “reasonably necessary” to support a debtor and his/her family are protected from creditors.

 

The uncertainty of what is “reasonably necessary” means some assets in extremely large IRAs might not be protected. Having said that, this issue will surely be brought to the court's attention in the future. However, for the time being, the vast majority of Americans will not have to worry about creditor attachment of their IRAs.

 

The ruling comes at a time when IRA assets are set to reach the $3 TRILLION mark and, for many Americans, the IRA has become their most significant retirement asset. Having the same protection in bankruptcy that workers receive for their 401(k) plans and company pensions shields a nest egg relied upon by millions of Americans and provides another layer of financial protection.

 

To view a copy of the Supreme Court ruling, and for more information on investing in real estate with a self-directed IRA, please visit http://www.trustetc.com/ruling.pdf.

 

About the author: Richard Desich is the Chairman and CEO of Equity Trust Company, the nation's leading provider of self-directed real estate IRAs, and has been personally investing in real estate for over 35 years. Nationally recognized as a pre-eminent authority on real estate investing in self-directed IRAs, 401ks and other retirement plans, Mr. Desich is also the author of the how-to book, "Proven Wealth Building Secrets for You and Your Children."

 

With over 32 years of experience, and tens of thousands of clients in all 50 states, Equity Trust Company is the leading provider of real estate IRAs, 401(k)s, and other retirement plans. Find more information on real estate investing with IRAs at http://www.trustetc.com/.



Go to Barney's Website for more information about educational events and materials.

Go to Karen's Website to apply for a 1-4 family loan or join us as a mortgage loan originator.

Go to  Zick Investment Properties to sell us a property or get a web site to sell your properties.

Go to Realvest Funding for more information about financing.

Register for an Options Boot Camp at http://www.zick.com/speventreg.html.

Register for a "How to Finance ANY Deal!" Boot Camp at http://www.zick.com/FinanceAnyDealBCreg.htm.

Register for a Mortgage Business Builder Boot Camp at http://www.zick.com/MortgageBCreg.shtml.

Register for a FREE "Financing Your Next Best Deal" Help Day at http://www.zick.com/HelpDayreg.htm.

Register for a FREE Freedom Equity/All Fund Mortgage TeleHelp Call at http://www.zick.com/telehelp_freedom_equity_recruiting.htm.

Questions?  Send us an email or call 800-677-3253.


Would you like to read past newsletters?  Click here

Scroll down to the bottom of the left-hand column to find links to all of our archived newsletters.


Remember: You may be my student, you may be my best friend and I MAY love you…but, I am not a lawyer.  I am not YOUR real estate broker.  You are not my client.  This e-mail is not intended as legal, real estate or accounting advice. 

 

Upcoming Events

“How to Finance ANY Deal!”

Three-Day Boot Camp in

San Diego

IMPORTANT!! 

Due to the overwhelming response we've received for this event, we moved it from the original location in Carlsbad to the following location: 

Holiday Inn Select
595 Hotel Circle South
San Diego, CA 92108
619-291-5720

Click here for more information or to register for the “How to Finance ANY Deal!” Boot Camp.

May 20th, 21st & 22nd we are presenting a new Boot Camp called "How to Finance ANY deal!"  We will cover Lease Options, Owner carried financing and Conventional and Hard money loans. Two new topics will be “Making Money Referring Commercial and Investment Loans” and “Getting Cash from Passive Investors – Structuring the Deals.”  This Boot Camp just keeps getting better and better! We may need to go to evening sessions to get it all in!



HAVE YOU ALWAYS WANTED TO LEARN ABOUT SHORT SALES???

Here's your opportunity to learn from the best. Lloyd & Sara Story (who are students of Barney’s) have become very successful doing short sales. They've been known to do 5-10 deals in a month!

They have graciously agreed to do a one-day seminar called
"Navigating the Short Sale." They will be teaching all their secrets to the lucky attendees. It will be held in Orlando, Florida on Saturday, May 14th. For the discounted price of $199.00, please click here or go to www.zick.com  and click on the calendar to register through Barney. Don't hesitate....the room will fill up quickly!



All new for 2005!  Learn it all in one place at one time.

 “Barney” Zick can show you...

“How to Finance ANY Deal!”

Announcing the most in-depth, intensive three-day Boot Camp you can imagine on real estate financing designed for people who are successful, aggressive real estate investors (or aspire to be someday soon)!  Investors know CASH IS KING and owner financing is the QUEEN!

As a real estate investor, there is nothing like having the ability to know what investing approach to use, know how to structure it, and know how to present it to the seller and get it closed.  Being able to cash out properties is the “grease for the wheels” of this cash intensive business.  The three roads to financing will be taught...Lease Options, Owner Carried Loans and Conventional and Hard Money Loans.  You will also get an opportunity to sign up and receive hands-on training about becoming a loan originator in order to add another cash flow stream of income.

SIGN UP TODAY AND PAY ONLY $695 of the $2,195 fee.  The balance will not be due unless you complete a successful deal from what you have learned!  How can we do this?  We strongly believe that you will learn what you need to know for success and that you will easily do a profitable deal right after attending!  This way we have more at risk than you.

That’s right; if you don't make money we don't get paid the balance of the training fee.  The entire program can be self funding!  You will make money from what you learn…paying you back more than the cost of training.  All you have to do is USE these ideas and we will show you how! 

At the three-day “How to Finance ANY Deal” Boot Camp we will send you out to investigate deals and sign them up.  Then when you come back, we will fine tune your presentation to make getting more deals easier.

Click here for more information or to register for the “How to Finance ANY Deal!” Boot Camp.



Questions?  Send us an email or call our office at 800-677-3253.



YET ANOTHER SATISFIED STUDENT!

Hi Barney,

I just want to say thank you for the Real Estate education I received from you!! I closed on a sale of a single family home and took home a check of $158,000!!!! I am convinced this happened because I learned the right question to ask. It is a very simple question and a very unique question that you taught me. I was the ONLY person/investor to be allowed to enter the property and present my offer which resulted in my purchase. All other investors were turned away because they did not know to ask the question I asked.

This property was bought 100% no-money-down and without my credit or any type of new loans. It really makes a difference when you are trained by a truly professional real estate investor who is not only very successful but also has years and years of experience. Just goes to show that if a person like me, with no real estate experience at all, (my only experience was stocking chicken!) can do it, anybody else with the right training can also do it.

Sincerely,

Ernie Vargas
http://ratrace.usana.com



The Fine Print...

We will do one newsletter like this one (Advice for the Impatient Investor) and one called the Zick Home Loans & Realvest Funding Mortgage Report, approximately once a month.  (However, keep in mind, our newsletters are free so don't get upset if we skip one occasionally!)  

Advice for the Impatient Investor has been published for fifteen years (but not in a row). The next issue should be out about June 1st.  The next Zick Home Loans & Realvest Funding Mortgage Report  will go out on or about May 15th.  

Folks smarter than us told us to say: We take no responsibility for the accuracy of the postings.  All contents of the postings are the responsibility of the posting party.  The foregoing material is strictly for informational purposes only and does not provide legal, financial, accounting or investing advice or services. Use of any of the foregoing information does not create a client relationship.  You should not act on the information provided without seeking legal, accounting and tax counsel of your choice.

We reserve the right to terminate the subscription of anyone at any time.

Copyright note: Submission of an email message or art work affirms that you are authorized to and have given Bernard Zick, et al, non-exclusive permission to reprint the content of your message in all forms, electronic or otherwise, in all languages throughout the world.

Copyright © 2005 by Real Estate Investors Training Corporation.

ISSN # 0272-8559

All Rights Reserved, no reprints to other email lists or websites without Bernard Zick's permission.

This email was sent to you by REIT, Corp. To ensure delivery to your inbox (not bulk or junk folders), please add Bernard Zick [bernard2-9168385@autocontactor.com] to your address book.

You have permission and are encouraged to forward this e-newsletter in its entirety to a friend!

Check out our website: www.zick.com.

To MANAGE YOUR SUBSCRIPTION, please send e-mail to: newsletter@zick.com.

Please type, 'change account information' in the subject line if you have an address change or if you no longer are interested in receiving this e-newsletter, type 'no thanks' in the subject line of your e-mail.

Our lists are NEVER sold.

Article submissions and questions are welcome and should be sent to newsletter@zick.com

Address: P.O. Box 6399, Kingwood, TX 77325-6399

Phone: 281-358-0409 Fax: 281-358-6591

Email: newsletter@zick.com

Website: www.zick.com